Will Protracted Nomination Fight Help or Hurt Democrats?

Common political wisdom in recent weeks, as exemplified by this report in the New York Times, is that a protracted nomination fight could spoil the best chance Democrats have in recent years of reclaiming the White House. With an unpopular president and a struggling economy, Democratic candidates Barack Obama (D-IL) and Hillary Clinton (D-NY) argue that they have a unique opportunity to claim the mantle of change and sail to victory. However, with neither likely to gain the nomination without the help of so-called superdelegates, neither appears likely to concede to the other any time soon. The result, many in the Democratic Party fear, is that they will tear each other down and hurt each other's chances at winning the presidency.
However, as a recent analysis in the Washington Post suggests, there may be a flip side to a protracted nomination fight: increased voter registration and interest. While Democrats participating in early contests outnumbered republicans by nearly 2 to 1 in states like Iowa, they are gaining an even greater advantage in registered voters in more recent states like Pennsylvania, where Republicans have no meaningful contest, with presumptive nominee John McCain (R-AZ) having already secured the delegates necessary to win the nomination.
Will a protracted nomination fight help or hurt Democrats? Post in the comments section below.
Enjoy the Law and Politics Blog? Subscribe to our RSS Feed
1 comments:
My view is that a protracted nomination fight will hurt Democrats, but, it doesn't have to be a fight. Instead, Obama and Clinton can compete with one another by contrasting what they will do with what McCain will do. In doing so the nomination process will take on more of a general election campaign feel and I think it will benefit the democrats.
Post a Comment